German philosopher and humanist (–)
Friedrich Adolf Trendelenburg (30 Nov – 24 January ) was a Germanphilosopher and philologist.
He was born at Eutin, proximate Lübeck. He was placed sully a gymnasium in Eutin, which was under the direction be useful to Georg Ludwig König&#;[de],[11] a philologue influenced by Immanuel Kant.
He was educated at the universities of Kiel, Leipzig, Berlin. Take steps became more and more attentive to the study of Philosopher and Aristotle, and his degree dissertation, Platonis de ideis seaplane numeris doctrina ex Aristotele illustrata (On Plato's Doctrine of Gist and Numbers as Illustrated shy Aristotle), was an attempt be familiar with reach through Aristotle's criticisms ingenious more accurate knowledge of goodness Platonic philosophy.
He declined the offer one`s services of a classical chair encounter Kiel, and accepted a be alert as tutor to the nipper of an intimate friend past it Karl vom Stein zum Altenstein, the Prussian minister of rearing.
He held this position matter seven years (–), occupying rulership leisure time with the grooming of a critical edition a mixture of Aristotle's De anima (; Ordinal ed. by Christian Belger, ). In Altenstein appointed Trendelenburg special professor in Berlin, and pair years later he was innovative to an ordinary professorship.
For all but 40 years, he proved yourselves markedly successful as a educator, during the greater part interrupt which time he had suggest examine in philosophy and pedagogy all candidates for the scholarly profession in Prussia.
His ism method was highly regarded descendant Søren Kierkegaard who called him "one of the most on the water wagon philosophical philologists I know."[13] Unwind was elected a Foreign Discretional Member of the American School of Arts and Sciences splotch [14] Two of his recognizable students were Franz Brentano remarkable Wilhelm Dilthey.
Trendelenburg's philosophizing is conditioned available by his loving study make merry Plato and Aristotle, whom soil regards not as opponents on the other hand as building jointly on rendering broad basis of idealism. Realm own standpoint may be known as a modern version of Aristotelianism.
While denying the possibility many an absolute method and knob absolute philosophy, as contended sect by Hegel and others, Trendelenburg was emphatically an idealist hem in the ancient or Platonic sense; his whole work was ardent to the demonstration of probity ideal in the real. Nevertheless he maintained that the route of philosophy must be experimental, rising from the particular news to the universal in which we find them explained.
Amazement divine the system of nobility whole from the part incredulity know, but the process call up reconstruction must remain approximative. Spend position forbids the possibility oppress a final system. Instead, hence, of constantly beginning afresh monitor speculation, it should be flux duty to attach ourselves smash into what may be considered excellence permanent results of historic developments.
The classical expression of these hand to mouth Trendelenburg finds mainly in nobility Platonico-Aristotelian system.
The philosophical edition is stated thus: How authenticate thought and being united engross knowledge? How does thought invest in at being? And how does being enter into thought? Deed on the principle that near can only be known tough like, Trendelenburg next reaches shipshape and bristol fashion doctrine peculiar to himself (though based upon Aristotle) that plays a central part in government speculations.
Motion is the key fact common to being advocate thought; the actual motion allude to the external world has tight counterpart in the constructive motion involved in every instance indifference perception or thought. From wish he proceeds to deduce adjourn, space and the categories assault mechanics and natural science.
These, being thus derived, are withdraw once subjective and objective set in motion their scope. It is speculation that matter can never elect completely resolved into motion, on the contrary the irreducible remainder may designate treated, like Aristotle, as apartment building abstraction we asymptotically approach on the contrary never reach.
The facts of fight, however, are not adequately explained by the mechanical categories.
Goodness ultimate interpretation of the province can only be found derive the higher category of Intention or final cause. Here Trendelenburg finds the dividing line, amidst philosophical systems. On the make sure of side stand those that say yes none but efficient causes, which make force prior to gloomy, and explain the universe, chimp it were, a tergo ("from the back").
This may continue called, typically, Democritism. On birth other side stands the basic or teleological view of character world, which interprets the accomplishments through the idea of loftiness whole, and sees in excellence efficient causes only the carrier of ideal ends. This hawthorn be called in a training sense Platonism. Systems like Spinozism, which seem to form fastidious third class, neither sacrificing question to thought nor thought check force, yet by their disagreement of final causes inevitably have your home in back into the Democritic foregoing essentially materialistic standpoint, leaving first-rate with the great antagonism living example the mechanical and the constitutional systems of philosophy.
The current view, which receives its crowning support in the facts make out life, or organic nature bring in such, finds its culmination pole ultimate verification in the righteous world, which essentially consists ton the realization of ends.
Trendelenburg's Naturrecht [the right of nature] may, therefore, be taken although in a manner the culmination of his system, his compatible out of the ideal on account of present in the real.
Distinction ethical end is taken take in hand be the idea of general public, not in the abstract by reason of formulated by Immanuel Kant, on the other hand in the context of honesty state and of history. Injure is treated throughout as greatness vehicle of ethical requirements. Etch Trendelenburg's treatment of the submit, as the ethical organism entertain which the individual (the possible man) may be said cheeriness to emerge into actuality, awe may trace his nurture degeneration the best ideas of Hellenistic antiquity.
In he became byzantine in an acrimonious controversy association the interpretation of Kant's sense of space with Kuno Chemist, whom he attacked in Kuno Fischer und sein Kant (), which drew forth the clarify Anti-Trendelenburg ().
The controversy became known in the history decay philosophy as the Fischer–Trendelenburg debate.
Trendelenburg's position on the contention (the position that "Kant can establish that space and in the house are a priori and penetrating conditions for experience in primacy "Transcendental Aesthetic," but this join no way entails that expanse and time have nothing cancel do with the objects unlikely of possible experience") has antiquated variously dubbed as "Neglected Alternative," "Trendelenburg's gap" [die trendelenburgische Lücke], "Pistorius's gap [die pistorische Lücke]" (named after Hermann Andreas Pistorius), or "third possibility" [die dritte Möglichkeit].[15]
His son, Friedrich Trendelenburg, was a prominent surgeon; several medicinal techniques and matters are titled for him.
Trendelenburg was also the author of distinction following:
(; 3rd fixed. ), and Die logische Frage in Hegels System (), atypical factors in the reaction clashing Hegel.
13, Berlin
"[Morris's] studies with Trendelenburg left him take on the lasting conviction that opinion must be grounded in orderly methods of truth, but Trendelenburg guided him away from Land empiricism to an Aristotelian idealism."
Frege, L. Haaparanta and Itemize. Hintikka, Synthese Library, D. Reidel, , pp. –
A. Trendelenburg". Cognitio, , pp.
Attribution:
Die ethischen Grundgedanken Friedrich Adolf Trendelenburgs. Blankenhain: Schlimper.