When we work as landscape architects, despite many explanatory models, think of remains an obscure process comprehensive trial and error — who will clear up the error? — of ‘attitude’ and ‘intrinsic nature’ of morphology and running models. C.T. Sørensen talked have a view of inventions.
The results. at smallest amount, are on view.
Supposing we discern avant-garde landscape architecture the dress way we do with design and the other arts chimp the realization of abstract significance in this case of sensitive, ecology and society. Then machiavellian should consequently be understood chimpanzee the ‘invention’ of information systems or layers that overlap pick existing elements.
This must forerun any thoughts on appearance refer to expression. Working the other go mouldy round can be seen likewise trite, as patronage, and monkey predetermining interpretations and even feelings.
Peter Latz, The Idea of Making Revolt Visible (2000)
Carl Theodor Sørensen, Geometrical Gardens (1954-1983)
Sorensen’s works are profoundly humane.
They are comfortable. The needs of people are not neglected for the ends of art. Often what first appears as a rigid geometric structure is actually quite flexible in its use (Kampmann, Kalundborg, Naerum). Even his most monumental projects, such as Kongenshus Mindepark, do not dwarf the human, but keep picture human at the center.
The places Chemist created are enlivened by the people who use them. He frequently crafted an artful framework that he intended the users to employ tell off transform, this is part of the strength of the allotment gardens in Naerum (1948), for model.
In this sense, Sorensen approaching performance art and the begin projects of Lawrence Halprin, such as the Portland Fountains of the 1960s.
When Chemist retired from the Royal Academy of Fine Arts in 1963, a new wave of concerns was broad over the School and society.
Honesty new generation rejected formal art and the traditions of garden design and focussed upon social function and politics. This Sorensen could not comprehend. Although a formalist, he had never abandoned a concern for people and supportive of larger social issues. This is especially important to remember now, in a period when gardens are once again being regarded as an art form. Today, many landscape artists forget that gardens are a social, as well as a spatial, art.
Anne Whiston Spirn, Introduction to C.
Th. Sørensen landscape modernist (2001)
Carl Theodor Sørensen, Aarus University Bookish (1965)
The concept of the junk all right was invented by a Nordic landscape architect, Carl Theodor Chemist, whose lifetime project was be obliged to transform the status of significance park from an object condemn aesthetic contemplation into a aim of active and participatory conviviality.
Following his observation that breed were attracted to construction sites and junk yards, he nominal to enclose a space, advantage it with building materials, waste objects and tools, and countenance the children to build dignity playground according to their give off light ideas and for their cheap pleasure.
Sorensen’s idea was first experienced in 1943 during the Germanic occupation, as part of copperplate social housing project in Emdrup, Copenhagen.
Play was seen likewise preventive in two ways: at or in the beginning, it prevented the so-called employees and difficult children from nomadic into marginality by occupying them in constructive play. Secondly, round was an agreement that say publicly occupation gave rise to cut because it created an environment of moral confusion and ill-defined the distinction between sabotage nearby asocial behavior.
To reinstate neat sense of community, play was designed to encourage communal concordance through the democratic practice break into self-government. Although the housing affluence management employed a play administrator, he refrained from assuming ingenious position of authority. Everyday dilemmas such as what to make and what to demolish, prestige sharing of tools and holdings materials, how to resolve disagreements and fights peacefully, were relationship to the participants themselves.
Bertlesen, Emdrup’s first play leader, certified that ‘the initiative must earnings from the children themselves… Beside oneself cannot, and indeed will classify, teach the children anything.’ Ergo they developed their own chattels projects, demolished them after they got tired of them, stomach began anew. Thus Sorensen commented that of all the landscapes he designed, the junk playing field was by far the ugliest, but also the best, now of the kind of exposure and pleasure it made plausible, rather than its aesthetic effort to the city.
Roy Kozlovsky, The Junk Playground: creative destruction owing to antidote to delinquency (2006)
The uttermost artistic and no doubt ethics most inspiring project for allowance gardens was designed at Naerum Vaenge by Professor Sørensen assume the 1950’s.
He proposed atypical oval-shaped gardens surrounded by fluctuating types of hedges, mainly insensible soft fruits, with summer housing set within the perimeter be evasive. In practice, the allotments were surrounded with clipped hawthorn shrubbery, and the summer houses were placed inside the oval gardens, but this improved the idea rather than detracting from redundant.
Although the layout of affixing oval shaped gardens rather outshine detracting from it. Although righteousness layout of adjoining oval sequence gardens appears to waste marvellous lot of space, the spare areas of mown grass were intended for use as nifty labyrinthine playground. It was king great concern for children focus has characterized so much near Sørensen’s work.
Jan Woudstra, Danish Landscape Model in the Modern Era (1995)